Skip to main content

HEY! I'm back. Whatever...


It’s been a good long time since I added any thoughts to this blog.  I have a couple good excuses.  I quit my job.  After years of trying to change the organization from within, I gave up.  The signs were all over all my previous posts, and I’d wager that most readers figured it out before I did.  I’m sure more spite will spittle into subsequent posts now and again.  Anyway, I spent what was left of my genius trying to find a job.

If you read the posts then you know that I live in a moderately rural part of the country and jobs that fit my skills are rarer than Kobe Bryant assists.   Eventually I hooked on with a much smaller org.  In addition to responsibilities in maintenance and engineering, I became the de facto purchasing manager, warehouse manager, relief supervisor, relief plant manager, part-time receiving clerk, etc etc.  It’s as much fun as I’ve ever had working.

However, people are still people, and people make orgs.  This org is much more functional than the last one, but there are still lessons to learn and occasions to ponder.

More on the new job…  It is a start-up company, which comes with a whole new set of issues and pressures.  Funding is a big worry.  I’d never heard the phrase “funding runway” until a couple months into it.  FYI, the funding runway is the length of time we can function before we run out of money.  Most of the key technology is serial number 1.  Sure, there are pumps and motors and mixers that one would see in any process plant, but the combinations thereof take some getting-used-to.  As I wrote in a post some months back, if you want to be creative, hire young engineers.  We have many.  And as I wrote in that post, young engineers often create interesting solutions to regular old problems, when sometimes experience would lead one into more elegant reactions. 

The experience level of the operators and techs is lower than I’ve seen at prior orgs.  The techs are folks who would fix their dad’s tractor back on the farm, where baling wire and duct tape are perfectly fine, and getting a bigger hammer can get decent short-term results.  The operators are the ones who weren’t smart enough to be able to fix dad’s tractor.  (Okay, I’ll admit that was a bit of a low blow.  My anti-operator bias is still breathing.)

More interesting still, since it’s a start-up, is that there is no HR in the org.  Regular employees like me officially work for a web company out of state.  I suppose that’s the wave of the future.  Thus far I’ve the ratio of positive/negative communications with HR is 2 with the new company; almost negative numbers with the old org (especially after I left – holy cow – if I thought they were dysfunctional before I was reminded how low zero was).

This lack of HR directly effects the worst thing about this job (and truth be told it aint that bad).  The techs and operators don’t work for our company.  They work for the plant next door.  Officially, we own the equipment and “advise” them on how to run it.  Or, in my case, I “make recommendations” on how to install and maintain the equipment.  The maintenance manager next door is the guy in charge, except he spends much more time and energy on his teenager’s hockeycareer than our plant.  There’s the void I stepped into, and it’s just fine with me.

Our neighbors hired a supervisor who acts like one of us, but the leash goes next door and their tugs get more of her attention than our Milkbones.  We can be in the middle of a trial (not a rare occurrence, as you might imagine), when she’ll get called to a meeting and poof! she’s magically transported to the Land of Nodding Off.  Meanwhile, we “advise” in her absence, and young engineers advising not-quite-yet competent operators…well…hilarity ensues.  For good engineers, the realization of the curse of knowledge doesn’t set in for a few years, and ours average only a couple off campus.  For good operators, the deer-in-headlights look vanishes after a few years, and ours max out at less than one.  I find I spend a couple hours a day talking the operators off the ledges our engineers leave them on.

But more on that some other time.  For now…middle management blues is dead.  Long live middle management, um, blues???

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who the &#$@^% are you?

I may have mentioned this in an earlier post, so forgive me for repeating, but I have never really fit the leadership mold of the plant where I work, and I suspect of the entire division of the company. They like the driver-driver model, type A personality. I’m not. On the Meyers-Briggs test I am right smack dab in the middle. In many places this would be a positive boon, but where I work I am considered weak, too accommodating, and a poor delegator. I would admit to the latter as something I need to improve (and would state unequivocally that it is better than delegating everything, which some of my co-workers do). I totally disagree that I’m weak (of course I do) and I’m proud that people think I’m accommodating. Ever since I started down the management track I have heard these complaints. I am certain that I was passed up for promotions because of these perceptions. I will freely admit that I have a naïve utopian worldview in which a for-profit company should be a meritocr...

Mysteries of Life

There are many mysteries of life that continue to astound me as I grow older and theoretically wiser.   A few I should mention: Why is popular music popular when it sucks asbad as it does ?   It makes me cringe.   Why do politicians of all stripes treat the public like a bunch of indolent morons?   Maybe we’ve earned it.   Lastly, why do people get promoted into management when they have absolutely no idea how to manage?   Conventional wisdom says that exceptional technicians (and I use this word in its broadest possible interpretation) tend to get promoted because they are exceptional technicians, not because they are good managers.   Rarely is there much thought given to the interpersonal gifts one may or may not have, especially in a technical organization.   I’ve found that many exceptional technicians are exceptionally terrible managers, and I bet that the same traits that make them good at their jobs are the very ones that make thei...

Setting Priorities

A manager will not be successful if he does not set priorities. Success comes in many colors and flavors, but if you measure it by the number of your employees who wish to remain your employees, a person who does not set priorities will not be successful. A manager who refuses to point the way is the antithesis of a leader; he is a bureaucrat. The corollary to this is that a good manager needs a good boss who is willing and able to set priorities. A weasel boss will not set priorities and then blame you when you fail to deliver. We will try to walk the fine line here, since we’re all middle managers, of managing versus leading. In some work dialects, they are synonymous. In some they have vastly different meanings. The fine line we’ll walk is that we will try to do more leading than managing. Leading is setting the way, finding the right path, being the good example, complimenting the good and coaching the bad, etc. Managing is ensuring report b-27 is complete, monitoring the abse...