Skip to main content

The gloves go on


Behind every screw-up, behind every poor decision, behind every botched project there lurks a conflict.  Someone, somewhere was not sure about what to do, or they favored the wrong thing, or they just plain misjudged the situation and bad things happened.  Bad things, man.  Life for a manager is tough enough and then fate throws bad things down.  How many times this week have you had to drop the good stuff to go pick up the debris from a conflict?

Trouble is, you rarely know a conflict is brewing.  They don’t teach ESP at Harvard last I heard, and they didn’t teach it at my beloved Podunk state school either.  There are pretty twisted people in my department, whether it is natural or self-induced, and I doubt I would want to know what they are thinking anyway.  But for their own good (and my own good) I need to know.  Maybe I can guess…

I’m not talking about the traditional definition of “conflict” here.  We don’t have employees nearly coming to blows, although we could probably sell tickets and make some money if we did.  These are internal conflicts.  For example…

We have a forklift operator who is conscientious about his activities.  Like most people he intends to do a good job for all the usual reasons, but mostly because it makes him feel good about himself.  (By the way, amateur psychotherapy is just another service I offer.)  We have rules about everything (we are a mature org) and one of our rules is that the mechanics must use some sort of hand protection, though the caveat (management weasel words) is that the employee should choose the correct type of protection so that they do not get injured.  We are also unbelievably dysfunctional about spending money.  We almost beg our mechanics to not spend any money.  The corollary to not spending is to find ways to make money, like saving scrap we can sell.

SO…we have created a conflict.  On one hand, we want our guys to wear the right gloves, and to get the right gloves a guy (or gal) would have to go to the material shed and check out new ones.  But this would be spending money, which we’ve already told them they should not do. 

Back to the forklift driver (remember him?)…  His job one morning was to dump a small trash dumpster into a bigger trash dumpster, and then take the bigger dumpster to storage.  A glimpse into the small dumpster made him stop, though.  It was a ribbon of steel that had come off a lathe, and it was in the trash, not the recycling.  So there’s conflict #1 – the ribbon is sharp and he should just leave it in the dumpster for trash, but we need to save money and that ribbon has some value for scrap.  Then, conflict #2, he knew he should not reach into a dumpster to grab something sharp without the correct gloves, but another set of gloves costs money, and we’re not supposed to spend any.  Obviously, he reached in to grab the ribbon, cut his hand, and became a recordable.  As I’ve written before, this is always a cause for management to go completely bat sh_t crazy.  If they just went bat sh_t I’d be fine with it, but they tend to flat lose their minds.  Anyway, sorry about that frustration-boiling-over sidebar, back to the topic at hand… 

You might think it would be exceptionally easy to cure a case of the conflicts.  If you set priorities and stick with them, the guys might be able to run down the list and make their own decisions.  Since our first priority is personal safety, followed by environmental safety, followed by operational efficiency, and THEN cost effectiveness (I mean, seriously, fourth!) the driver should have been able to use one set of fingers to determine what was most important.  As you all know, it aint that easy.  It aint that easy and then mgmt makes it harder.

First into the stew goes the conditional ways in which we use our goals/priorities.  Let’s say our driver and all his friends go to the material shed to get the right set of gloves.  WWMD?  Damn right – they would complain about all the money we’re spending on gloves (and by the way this is EXACTLY what happened following this incident).  Example #2 – impellers (the prop in a centrifugal pump for you business majors) tend to get sharp as they wear, and one day we had a line down to replace a pump that was not keeping up because the impeller was toast (though we did not know it at the time – I suppose we could have guessed).  When we saw the shape it was in, I sent the mechanic to the shed for the right gloves.  It took about 10 minutes, which extended the downtime.  I was told later that this was unacceptable.  Oh well – sometimes when you choose the right thing you get nailed and when you choose the wrong thing you’re a hero.

But back to conflicts.  In this case we had a conflict between stated policy and actual practice.  This is common – I’m sure you will find a few w/o having to look very hard.  The question is what to do with the ones you find.

An evaporating cloud is one approach that I like and that I’ve used successfully.  As with any tool, it doesn’t work well if you don’t use it well, and it isn’t the miracle drug some TOC folks would suggest.  But it is dam close to penicillin…

This webpage has a link to a couple ppt files that explain a cloud really well.  I met the author and I found that I agreed with most everything he said.  Unfortunately it appears the website itself is abandoned and lonely.  For other information, try this page (this one has references to Col John Boyd, USAF, who is not well known but he should be.  Check out his story in thishere book.)

We used the evaporating cloud method to solve the forklift driver issue.  In the second powerpoint article on the acloudaday site, the author writes about surfacing assumptions once you have your cloud created and verified.  We made the assumption that he would have used the gloves if they were right there and available.  Each morning when he jumps on his rig he has to fill out a vehicle condition check sheet so we added an item to it – “Cut resistant gloves”.  Now, before he even turns the key, he either has the right stuff or he’s going to get them, and, sure enough, he wears them all the time now.  It worked so well we extended it to all the shops – each one has a bin with gloves that is filled every week.  We haven’t had a hand injury since.  Knock on wood [gently].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who the &#$@^% are you?

I may have mentioned this in an earlier post, so forgive me for repeating, but I have never really fit the leadership mold of the plant where I work, and I suspect of the entire division of the company. They like the driver-driver model, type A personality. I’m not. On the Meyers-Briggs test I am right smack dab in the middle. In many places this would be a positive boon, but where I work I am considered weak, too accommodating, and a poor delegator. I would admit to the latter as something I need to improve (and would state unequivocally that it is better than delegating everything, which some of my co-workers do). I totally disagree that I’m weak (of course I do) and I’m proud that people think I’m accommodating. Ever since I started down the management track I have heard these complaints. I am certain that I was passed up for promotions because of these perceptions. I will freely admit that I have a naïve utopian worldview in which a for-profit company should be a meritocr...

Mysteries of Life

There are many mysteries of life that continue to astound me as I grow older and theoretically wiser.   A few I should mention: Why is popular music popular when it sucks asbad as it does ?   It makes me cringe.   Why do politicians of all stripes treat the public like a bunch of indolent morons?   Maybe we’ve earned it.   Lastly, why do people get promoted into management when they have absolutely no idea how to manage?   Conventional wisdom says that exceptional technicians (and I use this word in its broadest possible interpretation) tend to get promoted because they are exceptional technicians, not because they are good managers.   Rarely is there much thought given to the interpersonal gifts one may or may not have, especially in a technical organization.   I’ve found that many exceptional technicians are exceptionally terrible managers, and I bet that the same traits that make them good at their jobs are the very ones that make thei...

Setting Priorities

A manager will not be successful if he does not set priorities. Success comes in many colors and flavors, but if you measure it by the number of your employees who wish to remain your employees, a person who does not set priorities will not be successful. A manager who refuses to point the way is the antithesis of a leader; he is a bureaucrat. The corollary to this is that a good manager needs a good boss who is willing and able to set priorities. A weasel boss will not set priorities and then blame you when you fail to deliver. We will try to walk the fine line here, since we’re all middle managers, of managing versus leading. In some work dialects, they are synonymous. In some they have vastly different meanings. The fine line we’ll walk is that we will try to do more leading than managing. Leading is setting the way, finding the right path, being the good example, complimenting the good and coaching the bad, etc. Managing is ensuring report b-27 is complete, monitoring the abse...