Skip to main content

Redux

Ah, sweet summertime, allowing me to hang outside until bedtime.  Unfortunately I haven't been writing, but you already knew that.  So, some catching up...
In a recent post that seemed to be about the band Phish but really had some lessons it in (trust me), I forgot to mention one thing about younger workers that I should have made clear: they screw up.  All the time.  In my org this is the opportunity for the manager to pull the poor quivering kid into his office, close the door, and make like a dickhead for five or ten minutes.  There really are few better ways to stifle creativity than yelling and screaming.  However, if you can stomach a mistake now and then, and if you're patient, and if you can keep the kid out from under the bus people will send for him, the bright light of new stuff will guide you into obscene bonuses and thoughtless promotions.  Or not.  Just go easy on them - they were you, once.  You can tolerate a mistake every now and then.
I recently wrote that our plant manager was a world-class second-guesser and a national champion blame-affixer (and those are some of his good points).  This will come as no surprise - he was recently removed from his duties (or vice-versa) and sent back down to the minor leagues where he came from.  Our new plant manager was plant manager years ago, and was promoted away from us to a bigger plant in a less desirable area of the country.  The scuttlebutt has it that his wife made him threaten to quit if they didn't find him a job in a more suitable (for her, of course) location.  They took him in at HQ for a while, but he must have worn out his welcome there and they've sloughed him off on us.  Added bonus: he hates my guts.  This is the Einstein who was perfectly willing to fire people who showed deterioration in their hearing tests (we have annual testing) so the company could avoid paying for their hearing aids after they retire (and he was incredulous when told that this would be illegal)(it's due to managers like him that we have OSHA, NLRB, the FBI, and a boatload of other TLAs and FLAs...). 
A month or two back I shared about a young engineer who had taken on a critical and difficult task when one of our senior guys quit, leaving the then-manager a heads-you-win, tails-I-lose decision about whether or not to go through with the task as it could shut the plant down (he went for it).  The engineer erred - he asked a tech if the tech was familiar with the job, received an answer in the affirmative, and let the guy go on his way...to screw up because he really had no clue and was too dumb/proud/scared to admit it.  Mgmt came down on the head of the engineer, even though he had busted his butt to make the job happen.  He barely escaped the death by one thousand pointing fingers, and when it was clear he was less than mortally wounded (I believe I'll pull through, sir) he was slightly indignant.  Indignant enough to go out and find a better job.  He's gone and now we have no engineers in that section.  They thought they had one hired, but I heard that the interviewee's salary demands are more than the manager makes (and nearly twice what the kid made).  Proof that pointy hair will cost you money...
Some good news to report.  Well, all things are relative...  The new (or should I say latest) boss, who was already retirement age when we hired him, is doing very well.  He filters the less rational edicts that come from above, he includes many in his deliberations and decision-making, and he has realistic expectations about the amount of work that can be done in a day.  BTW when the plant manager was paddled and sent back to his old plant like a naughty school boy, it was the exec VP who came to the plant to personally administer the hacks.  We all knew he was coming (the rumor mill is effective) and we laid even odds that our boss would be the one getting the professional vasectomy instead.  Thankfully we were wrong.  Even though the exec VP has the brain of a bi-polar rodent, he managed to get this one right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who the &#$@^% are you?

I may have mentioned this in an earlier post, so forgive me for repeating, but I have never really fit the leadership mold of the plant where I work, and I suspect of the entire division of the company. They like the driver-driver model, type A personality. I’m not. On the Meyers-Briggs test I am right smack dab in the middle. In many places this would be a positive boon, but where I work I am considered weak, too accommodating, and a poor delegator. I would admit to the latter as something I need to improve (and would state unequivocally that it is better than delegating everything, which some of my co-workers do). I totally disagree that I’m weak (of course I do) and I’m proud that people think I’m accommodating. Ever since I started down the management track I have heard these complaints. I am certain that I was passed up for promotions because of these perceptions. I will freely admit that I have a naïve utopian worldview in which a for-profit company should be a meritocr...

Mysteries of Life

There are many mysteries of life that continue to astound me as I grow older and theoretically wiser.   A few I should mention: Why is popular music popular when it sucks asbad as it does ?   It makes me cringe.   Why do politicians of all stripes treat the public like a bunch of indolent morons?   Maybe we’ve earned it.   Lastly, why do people get promoted into management when they have absolutely no idea how to manage?   Conventional wisdom says that exceptional technicians (and I use this word in its broadest possible interpretation) tend to get promoted because they are exceptional technicians, not because they are good managers.   Rarely is there much thought given to the interpersonal gifts one may or may not have, especially in a technical organization.   I’ve found that many exceptional technicians are exceptionally terrible managers, and I bet that the same traits that make them good at their jobs are the very ones that make thei...

Setting Priorities

A manager will not be successful if he does not set priorities. Success comes in many colors and flavors, but if you measure it by the number of your employees who wish to remain your employees, a person who does not set priorities will not be successful. A manager who refuses to point the way is the antithesis of a leader; he is a bureaucrat. The corollary to this is that a good manager needs a good boss who is willing and able to set priorities. A weasel boss will not set priorities and then blame you when you fail to deliver. We will try to walk the fine line here, since we’re all middle managers, of managing versus leading. In some work dialects, they are synonymous. In some they have vastly different meanings. The fine line we’ll walk is that we will try to do more leading than managing. Leading is setting the way, finding the right path, being the good example, complimenting the good and coaching the bad, etc. Managing is ensuring report b-27 is complete, monitoring the abse...